Incarnate Faith

A great difficulty with which American Christians need to struggle is the separation of religion and “real life” into airtight compartments. Religion is accepted as a purely subjective idea, but is not considered either true or false in an objective, public way. As a Lutheran interested in apologetics, this situation has always posed a special challenge. I am not altogether surprised that Kierkegaard—the philosopher often credited with introducing this separation into modern thought (though he no doubt would reject the extent to which it is now taken)—was raised nominally Lutheran. Of course, neither Luther’s own thought nor our confessions necessitate such separation; they express real salvation from real sins through a real Savior. Nevertheless, the central doctrine of the Christian faith—justification by faith alone apart from works—and many of its corollaries such as the fact that we cannot believe “by our own reason or strength” make strong distinctions which can be easily perverted into utter separation of faith from a daily life which inevitably involves our works and reason. Luther’s comments on “incarnate faith” in his Galatians commentary (AE 26: 265-70) represent a beautiful way of expressing Christianity in the realm of “real life” without in any way betraying its most essential doctrines.

Read More

Posted in Apologetics, Lutheranism, Sanctification, Theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Singularity

I’ve been hearing a lot of people talking about The Singularity (recently popularized in this article from Time).  What struck me most about the article wasn’t the concept itself (consciousness becoming immortal through some kind of fusion with highly advanced computing technology is old hat to sci-fi fans), but rather the evenhanded treatment that Time provided to a fairly outlandish concept.

One wonders if Time would provide such open-minded coverage to other outlandish concepts which nevertheless have better evidence.  Somehow I can’t see them writing:

“The difficult thing to keep sight of when you’re talking about the Resurrection is that even though it sounds like fantasy, it isn’t, no more than the Gallic Wars are fantasy. It’s not a fringe idea; it’s a serious hypothesis about the events in Palestine 2000 years ago.  There’s an intellectual gag reflex that kicks in anytime you try to swallow an idea that involves the dead rising to life, but suppress it if you can, because while the Resurrection appears to be, on the face of it, preposterous, it’s an idea that rewards sober, careful evaluation”

Or

“If you can swallow that idea, and Jesus of Nazareth and a lot of other very smart people can, then all bets are off.”

Posted in Apologetics, Culture | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Rules for Posting

Rules are usually the result of someone doing something they shouldn’t have.  That warning on your chainsaw about not stopping the chain with your hands?  There’s probably a stupid story behind that.

Since this blog is too young to have any stupid stories, let’s just keep it simple for now:

Rule #1:  Don’t be a jerk

I’ll elaborate on this as necessary, but let’s try not to make this a hall of shame.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment