{"id":148,"date":"2011-06-19T11:28:01","date_gmt":"2011-06-19T15:28:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/?p=148"},"modified":"2019-03-24T07:17:28","modified_gmt":"2019-03-24T11:17:28","slug":"incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/","title":{"rendered":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition"},"content":{"rendered":"

A few months ago, in the hype surrounding Prince William and Kate’s then-upcoming marriage, a story emerged that Prince William would choose not to wear a ring–apparently because he just doesn’t like jewelry.\u00a0 Boundless\u00a0posted about it,<\/a> and the predictable comments that followed trod the well-worn path of nearly every argument I’ve witnessed concerning tradition.\u00a0 On the one hand, you have the traditionalists.\u00a0 They perceived that something was wrong with the choice, but because they could not articulate that perception (and perhaps did not understand it), they came off as saying that tradition should always be followed simply because it is tradition.\u00a0 If you follow it, you’re morally correct, and if you do not, you are morally wrong.\u00a0 On the other hand, you had the modernists who deemed that tradition was completely arbitrary and therefore could be dismissed for any reason–or no reason at all.\u00a0 The ring, they said, is just a piece of metal.\u00a0 It is a morally irrelevant ritual, and the only thing that makes\u00a0the ritual symbolic of commitment is a choice to see it that way.\u00a0 Since that choice is purely personal, there is absolutely no basis for moral judgment whatsoever.<\/p>\n

Nearly every debate I’ve seen over any particular tradition ends up along these lines, which is unfortunate, since neither point-of-view is rich enough to really evaluate traditions.\u00a0 We all know traditions are not moral absolutes, for the latter often demand that we violate the former.\u00a0 We are allowed to question and, at times, reject them.\u00a0 At the same time, however, relegating tradition and physical matter to mere symbols with only subjective meaning–in a way in which “merely,” “just,” and “only” are the key words–leads to a highly impoverished view of life which cannot take the world around us seriously.\u00a0 Instead, I’d like to use this ring issue as a case study in which we examine tradition as a kind of incarnation of moral value–a way in which higher things become enfleshed.<\/p>\n

The issue surrounding the wedding ring is all about marital fidelity–a commitment to be entirely faithful (including, but not limited to sexual fidelity) to one’s spouse.\u00a0 If someone refuses to wear this ring, does that really indicate a rejection of marital commitment?\u00a0 The answer, I think, is “probably.”<\/p>\n

Commitment does not exist in abstraction anymore than humans exist in abstraction–both exist when they are incarnate in the world around us.\u00a0 For example, if someone punched you in the face, would you accept the excuse that they didn’t really punch you<\/em> they merely punched some bits of flesh and bone\u00a0belonging to the real you that you\u00a0happen to be\u00a0rather fond of?\u00a0 After all, we’re more than just flesh and bone, right?\u00a0 While humans may be more than just flesh and not all flesh is human, we nevertheless are<\/em> flesh.\u00a0 It is in precisely this way that wearing a wedding ring is<\/em> commitment.\u00a0 Abstract commitment is no commitment at all just as an abstract human isn’t really a human.\u00a0 Both must be incarnate.\u00a0 Wearing a ring is<\/em> marital commitment and a refusal to wear one is a rejection of the same.<\/p>\n

But you say “our commitment is incarnate in our actions!”\u00a0 Indeed it is, but in which ones?\u00a0\u00a0 In resisting temptations to divorce and other forms of adultery?\u00a0 Certainly; if you don’t have that, you don’t have commitment at all.\u00a0 Nevertheless, bare-minimum commitment is hardly what a spouse looks for.\u00a0 It would be like eating only when you’re about to starve.\u00a0 Sure, it’s “enough” in a purely mechanical sense, but that’s precisely the point:\u00a0 why would a sane person want<\/em> to reduce it to a purely mechanical sense?\u00a0 Likewise, why reduce commitment to the mere mechanism of only inserting tab A into slot B rather than into slots C-Z?\u00a0 In engineering, it is said that perfection in design is reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away (while still leaving the essence of the design intact).\u00a0 It should be obvious, however, that life is deeper than just an engineering problem.\u00a0 It is not all about tolerances and extremes–it is about living well.\u00a0 Practicing commitment only when it is being tested to its breaking point is foolishness.\u00a0 Rituals like wearing a\u00a0ring\u00a0give one the chance of making his commitment incarnate even when one is not under assault–to nurture it to withstand those breaking points when they do come.<\/p>\n

But you say, “what about people who are allergic to metal, or those who work in a machine shop & have serious saftey concerns, etc?\u00a0 Are they therefore less comitted?”\u00a0 Certainly not, any more than someone who has lost an arm is any less human as a result.\u00a0 Nevertheless, they clearly suffer an injury.\u00a0 Whether it is mild or severe is up for debate, but it is an injury to commitment to be unable to participate in a key cultural ritual that enfleshes commitment.\u00a0 A wise person in such a situation would\u00a0make an extra effort\u00a0to compensate for the injury by making commitment incarnate in different ritual.\u00a0 On the other hand, only a fool would arbitrarily take deprivation upon himself for trivial reasons.\u00a0 Rejecting a ring because one doesn’t like jewelry is akin (in kind, but certainly not degree) to cutting off an arm because one doesn’t like meat.\u00a0 A sane person who actually does such a thing surely has a deeper reason than simple distaste.\u00a0 Maybe this reason is good; maybe it is bad.\u00a0 What we can be certain of, however, is that there is<\/em> a reason.<\/p>\n

But you say, “there are lots of ways to ritualize commitment!\u00a0 A ring is just one among thousands–each one as good as any other.”\u00a0 This is true as far as it goes.\u00a0 Likewise, a person can become incarnate in an infinite variety of ways (skin tones, hair color, height, strength\/weakness, intelligence\/stupidity etc), but it’s always a combination of particulars which were handed over by those who begat their offspring.\u00a0 In the same way, meaningful ritual is begotten by those who came before and handed over into the care of their successors.\u00a0 There are certainly other ways in which commitment could become incarnate than wearing a ring; different cultures have produced an abundance of options.\u00a0 Nevertheless, the ring was\u00a0an incarnation that the prince’s culture handed over to him.\u00a0 It is not merely a little piece of metal or a symbol that he willfully rejects, but an incarnation of commitment that he already posessed.<\/p>\n

Perceptive readers will notice that none of this means that tradition and ritual ought never be changed–the key point of contention in the typical argument.\u00a0 What it does<\/em> mean is that changing such things is neither trivial nor meaningless–something implied by every\u00a0commentator who described wedding rings in a way that hinges on “just” or “merely” or “only”.\u00a0 We are not really in a position to appropriately judge the prince either guilty or innocent.\u00a0 “He doesn’t like jewelry” is a reason he gave that the media picked up on, but is unlikely to be the whole story.\u00a0 Those who assign him guilt make themselves into judgmental busybodies, but recognizing the real<\/em> (not symbolic) meaning of wedding rings that he rejected is not the same thing as a guilty verdict.\u00a0 Nevertheless, those who assign him innocence by means of shutting their eyes to real meaning impoverish themselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A few months ago, in the hype surrounding Prince William and Kate’s then-upcoming marriage, a story emerged that Prince William would choose not to wear a ring–apparently because he just doesn’t like jewelry.\u00a0 Boundless\u00a0posted about it, and the predictable comments … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,37],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nIncarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A few months ago, in the hype surrounding Prince William and Kate’s then-upcoming marriage, a story emerged that Prince William would choose not to wear a ring–apparently because he just doesn’t like jewelry.\u00a0 Boundless\u00a0posted about it, and the predictable comments … Continue reading →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The 96th Thesis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@matt_e_cochran\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@matt_e_cochran\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Matt\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Matt\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa\"},\"headline\":\"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\"},\"wordCount\":1231,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Ethics\",\"Tradition\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\",\"name\":\"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"The 96th Thesis\",\"description\":\"The Devil Never Sleeps; so the Reformation never ends.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa\",\"name\":\"Matt\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profile.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profile.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"Matt\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\"},\"description\":\"Software engineer by trade; lay theologian by nature; Lutheran by grace.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/matt_e_cochran\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@lutheraninastrangeland9746\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/author\/matt\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis","og_description":"A few months ago, in the hype surrounding Prince William and Kate’s then-upcoming marriage, a story emerged that Prince William would choose not to wear a ring–apparently because he just doesn’t like jewelry.\u00a0 Boundless\u00a0posted about it, and the predictable comments … Continue reading →","og_url":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/","og_site_name":"The 96th Thesis","article_published_time":"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00","author":"Matt","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@matt_e_cochran","twitter_site":"@matt_e_cochran","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Matt","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/"},"author":{"name":"Matt","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa"},"headline":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition","datePublished":"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/"},"wordCount":1231,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa"},"articleSection":["Ethics","Tradition"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/","url":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/","name":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition - The 96th Thesis","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-19T15:28:01+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-24T11:17:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/incarnate-value-a-case-study-on-tradition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Incarnate Value: A Case Study on Tradition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/","name":"The 96th Thesis","description":"The Devil Never Sleeps; so the Reformation never ends.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/026b49396f19b6940e8bb4a68d94b5fa","name":"Matt","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profile.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/profile.jpg","width":400,"height":400,"caption":"Matt"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/"},"description":"Software engineer by trade; lay theologian by nature; Lutheran by grace.","sameAs":["https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog","https:\/\/twitter.com\/matt_e_cochran","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@lutheraninastrangeland9746"],"url":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/author\/matt\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1244,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148\/revisions\/1244"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/matthewcochran.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}